T-72B3 After Two Hundred Modifications: Better, But Still Not a New Generation

Military Watch Magazine: Upgrading Soviet Vehicles Saves in Battle Today, But Distances Russia from New Generation Tanks

Military Watch Magazine has concluded that Russia, by being forced to rely on deep modernization of the Soviet T-72B3, is solving tactical tasks of today, but at the same time risks falling behind in the technological race of tomorrow.

T-72B3M
T-72B3M

Journalists acknowledge that about two hundred modifications, new sights, reinforced armor, and active protection systems have indeed increased the survivability and firepower of these vehicles on the battlefield. Crews, operating from cover and with drone support, are now more confident in engaging camouflaged targets and suffer fewer losses.

T-72B3
T-72B3

However, the editors emphasize that even the most thorough "upgrade" does not change the essence: the T-72 remains a 1970s design with limited potential for integrating digital systems, network interfaces, and solutions for countering drone swarms. While the Russian defense industry invests resources in extending the life of an aging platform, countries like China and South Korea are already commissioning fourth-generation tanks — with a fundamentally new architecture, distributed control, and adaptation to the conditions of war where drones play a major role.

T-72B3 with anti-drone protection
T-72B3 with anti-drone protection

The publication notes that the delay in launching the promising T-14 forces Moscow to seek a compromise in the form of the T-72B3M and even the unofficial T-72B4. But this decision, according to analysts, is forced and does not negate the systemic problem: without switching to a "clean slate" and creating a new platform, the Russian army will be forced to catch up, rather than set trends in the development of armored forces.

The main conclusion of Military Watch Magazine is that the modernization of the T-72B3 is an effective measure to reduce losses and increase combat readiness in the current conflict, but it does not replace the development of a new generation tank. If Russia continues to rely on the Soviet legacy, the technological gap with the leaders of the global armored vehicle industry will only grow.

Читайте ещё материалы по теме:

Now on home