Participants in the banking market have criticized the bill on the creation of state systems "Anti-Phishing" and "Anti-Fraud," which is being prepared for the first reading in the State Duma.
The document introduces mandatory rules for identification, call marking, authentication through the Unified Biometric System (UBS), and a ban on banks communicating with clients in foreign messengers. However, bankers believe that the proposed measures are excessive and their implementation is technically difficult.
The National Financial Market Council (NFMC) has sent proposals to the State Duma to soften the requirements of the bill. Experts believe that a complete rejection of foreign messengers is impossible and propose limiting the ban only to legally significant actions (signing contracts, transferring banking secrets). The NFMC also opposes mandatory authentication through the UBS when logging into banking applications, since only 3 million fingerprints are registered in the system, which will effectively block access to online banking for 97% of citizens.
Bankers fear that call marking in the current version of the law will lead to mass blocking of important notifications, including messages about collections and confirmation codes. They propose limiting marking only to advertising calls.
The "Financial Innovations" Association doubts that state systems will cope with the load. The association of participants in the electronic money market proposes simplifying the use of biometrics for opening accounts and restoring access, but without mandatory identification through the UBS.
Bankers are calling on legislators to revise the initiative, making it more realistic and technically feasible.
Read materials on the topic:
After the introduction of self-bans on loans, fraudsters may increase phishing attacks on Russians
