Modernization of Tu-95MS and Tu-160M, creation of PAK DA, development of "Sarmat" and "Yars": what the current state armament program includes
The document adopted in 2017 predicted what weapons the army would need
Tu-95MS
Volume of Kh-101 cruise missile production for Tu-95MS and Tu-160 bombers revealed
In non-nuclear configuration, the Kh-101 carries a 400-kilogram high-explosive warhead
Full Combat Load of Tu-95MS Bomber with Kh-101 Cruise Missiles Revealed
Russia did not use more than six aircraft at a time
Building hangars for Tu-95MS and Tu-160 "strategic bombers" is prohibited by the treaty with the USA: what is START-III
Russia cannot have more than 700 units of ballistic missiles of various classes
New Reinforced Concrete Shelters for Aviation Spotted: But Not for Tu-95MS, Tu-160, and Tu-22M3 "Strategic Bombers"
The fortifications were noticed at the Khalino airfield in the Kursk region
Production of Tu-95MS Bombers Can Be Revived in Russia: All Opportunities Exist
Deputy Gurulev believes that the production of new "Bears" can be started at the Samara Aviation Plant
Russian "Strategists" Tu-95MS, Tu-160 and Tu-22M3 Will Be "Hidden" in Hangars: No Grounds for Returning to Arms Reduction Treaty with the US
The Russian Foreign Ministry recalled that the treaty completes its life cycle in eight months
Aviation expert: Russia does not need to restore the production of Tu-95MS and Tu-22M3 bombers
However, existing aircraft should be kept in "on wing" condition
"Sloppiness": Deputy Explained Why Tu-95, Tu-160, and Tu-22M3 Are Not Protected at Airfields
The lack of protection at strategic airfields was called a systemic problem
Russia Doesn't Need a New Strategic Bomber: Tu-95MS and Tu-22M3 Meet Modern Requirements
Aviation Expert Gusarov Reminded That Missile Carriers Have Undergone Deep Modernization
What is the balance of power between Russia and the United States in strategic aviation? Are losses not scary?
Military correspondent Kots: Russia has never had parity in strategic bombers
Construction of Hangars for Tu-95MS, Tu-22M3, and Tu-160 Deemed Pointless: "Strategic" Aircraft Are Not Stationary
Reserve Officer Shalandin Calls Shelters for Long-Range Aviation Aircraft a Waste of Valuable Time
Cheaper than "White Swans": The write-off of Tu-95MS bombers was called unacceptable
"Bears" will be useful in the sky until at least 2040
Why did the Russian "strategists" Tu-95MS, Tu-160, and Tu-22M3 remain in the open air? The START-3 version turned out to be not so clear-cut
Tires on strategic missile carriers are not suitable for protection
Why Shelters Were Not Built for Tu-95MS, Tu-160, and Tu-22M3 Strategic Bombers: There Is a Clear Explanation
"Military Review": Missile Carriers Must Be Placed in Open Parking Lots in Accordance with the START-3 Treaty