Minsk Tractor Works (MTZ) uses only Belarusian units, assemblies and parts for its equipment. This is stated in an article in the newspaper "Republic", dedicated to the BELARUS 82.3 tractor.
The BELARUS 82.3 universal row-crop tractor is an updated version of the BELARUS 82.1. It is designed for a wide range of agricultural and municipal works.
It is used with various mounted, semi-mounted and trailed units, including loading and transport operations. It is available with a front driving axle of portal and beam types.
What is the difference between BELARUS 82.3 and BELARUS 82.1:
- Synchronized mechanical gearbox 14x12 with reverse of all gears
- Rear power take-off of "disc" type
- Electro-hydraulic drive of the front driving axle
The tractor is made in a corporate style with new lighting devices. Low and high beam headlights are spot, rear lights and a flashing beacon are LED, and rear-view mirrors have a heating function.
Read also on the topic:
For plowing African red soil: Chuvashia increased exports of tractors to the Black Continent
Now on home
The reason for indexation may be inflation, an increase in VAT, and rising production costs
The Ministry of Industry and Trade believes that the increase in the levy will not affect responsible manufacturers
The crew accelerated the aircraft to 580 km/h instead of the cruising speed of 450 km/h
Ship equipment comes to Russia from China at inflated prices
Almaz-Antey and the Belarusian Ministry of Defense signed a contract for equipment maintenance
The complex's computing resources allow for the competent distribution of targets between launchers
Among the spacecraft are Aist-2T No. 1 and No. 2
Deputy Prime Minister Novak announced a postponement of the deadlines, but confirmed the commitment to developing the sector
Design engineers without experience are promised salaries from 80 thousand rubles
Hard and dense shot ensures the destruction of the target from the first hit, regardless of the drone's body material
Almost all body elements are zinc-treated
SOGAZ lost the case in court against UEC-UMPO