Sarmat, Avangard, Zircon, Oreshnik, and Burevestnik Missiles: Are They Really "Unrivaled"?

Now it's not a slogan, but a brand of the Russian missile industry

From Sarmat to Oreshnik, the expression "unrivaled" has become an integral part of Russia's military rhetoric. What is behind this formula, which missiles are truly unique, and where is it more about marketing? "The First Technical" investigated.

Launch of the RS-28 Sarmat missile from the Plesetsk cosmodrome

Vladimir Putin on the prospects of Russian models:

Our promising weapons have no analogues in the world... And, I think, they will not [have] for a long time.
Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian Federation

This widely cited statement was later used as a "benchmark" for many announcements.

ICBM Sarmat - Putin after the tests

During a video conference on the results of the Sarmat launch, Putin congratulated the participants of the tests.

It has no analogues in the world, and will not have for a long time.
Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian Federation

"Sarmat" is truly unique in terms of mass and declared range (up to 18,000 km). However, the American LGM-30G Minuteman III and the Chinese DF-41 have similar characteristics - that is, there are no complete analogues, but the class of weapon is the same.

"Avangard" - a statement about a fundamentally new system

One of the key examples is the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle. In public speeches and interviews, Vladimir Putin emphasized that the missiles have no analogues in the world yet.

They will probably appear in a few years, but no one has them yet.
Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian Federation

At that time, in 2019, this was indeed the case: the United States and China did not have serial hypersonic units. Today, the United States is testing the C-HGB system, and Beijing is promoting the DF-ZF with similar characteristics.

Illustration of the "Avangard" missile

"Zircon" - assessment of military experts

The Zircon hypersonic anti-ship missile was commented on in Russian publications not only by officials, but also by military experts, for example, retired Rear Admiral Vladimir Dudko.

Zircon is in the testing phase. There is no analogue yet among any of the potential adversaries.
Vladimir Dudko, retired Admiral

"Zircon" became the first really tested hypersonic anti-ship complex, but similar programs were launched for state tests - the American HAWC and the Chinese YJ-21. That is, Russia is ahead in speed (≈9 M), but the gap is narrowing.

"Oreshnik" - are there really no analogues?

Putin also noted that the newest Oreshnik hypersonic missile system has no analogues in the world.

Of course, there are no analogues to Oreshnik in the world, and I think such analogues will not appear soon.
Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian Federation

Little is known about Oreshnik - the project is classified. According to open data, we are talking about a new hypersonic strike system with a range of up to 5500 km. It can only be stated that intercontinental missiles are definitely not only in Russia.

Instead of an epilogue

The statement that a certain weapon "has no analogues" is a stable element of defense rhetoric. The examples of Burevestnik, Sarmat and Oreshnik show how this wording is used to create the image of a technological breakthrough.

Earlier www1.ru reported that a Russian tank was equipped with incredibly dense anti-drone protection.

Read more materials: